Symposium

Concept

Simple, Direct and Clear ( I should )
NO arbitrary

  1. seeing is touching
    • Tangible → Tangy → Tang
  1. Reference
    Sol Lewitt

  • Sierpinski Fractal/carpet
  • Facade

Image research / experiment

  1. Screen size
    1440:1080 = 4:3
    1728:1296 = 4:3 (90%)
    1152:864 = 4:3 (80%)
    Total : ~50%
  2. Arrange the space

( pixel picture ) → ( 4 ) Rearrange ( colour to become 3D blocks )

Story

  1. I am Standing front. Holding A4 page. Turn the page Screen also turn.
    • Start with explanatory sound (this would be better) or voice?
  2. Without an actual picture and simply put the picture frame.
    (Technically it is, but actually, it is not (?))
  1. Moving with squares but don’t need to full-time acting — Maybe I should do like the conversation.

I Talk, Image react
Image Move itself.

  1. Falling down cubes
  2. Dissolving frames. picking up the cubes at the shoot to the original place.
  3. It starts with the projector so it would be interesting the projector finally becoming the frame.

Questions

  1. Screen size & ratio
  2. Actual the height of the projector screen
    Do I need to be same height with the screen? but check
  1. 7m ( 1m preparation + 5m ~ 6m performance + 1m leave)
  2. From the 3D cubes build up the
  3. You bring the question about the frame + picture + object.
  4. Asking Michael about the Remoter ( 3 days a weak in the morning )

Circular reciprocal Relationship

Problem

You do not have sufficient freedom levels to view this video. Support free software and upgrade.